For nearly six years now, Google and Oracle have been going back and forth over the copyright infringement lawsuit revolving around the use of Java APIs in Android. Ahead of a pretrial scheduled end of April, Oracle is seeking as much as US $9.3 billion in damages in a long-running copyright lawsuit against Google over its use of Java in Android, court filings show.
The companies went to trial over the matter in 2012 but the jury was split on the crucial question of whether Google’s use of Java was protected by "fair use," which permits copying under limited circumstances.
They're headed back to a federal district court in San Francisco for a new trial due to begin May 9. As last time, a parade of star witnesses is expected to take the stand, including Oracle’s Larry Ellison and Google’s Eric Schmidt.
The damages figure appears in a report compiled by an expert hired by Oracle to calculate how much Google should pay for its alleged infringement.
The figure could be reduced before the case gets to trial. It's currently about 10 times the sum Oracle was seeking when the case went to trial last time.
The increase reflects the dramatic growth of both Android and the smartphone market in the intervening years. The new trial will cover six additional versions of Android, up to and including Lollipop.
To put $9.3 billion in context, Google’s parent company, Alphabet, made $4.9 billion in profit last quarter.
Damn! EMC/Dell Can Tell a Mean Flash Story
Google has hired its own damages expert who's sure to have come up with a much lower estimate for how much harm Oracle suffered. That damages report isn't yet public, but a filing by Oracle last week suggests Google caps at least part of the damages at $100 million.
When damages estimates vary widely, juries often settle on a figure somewhere in between.
Google did not respond to requests for comment, and an Oracle spokeswoman declined to comment.
At issue in the case is Google's decision to use Java as the basis for its Android operating system without obtaining a license from Sun.
In the first trial, a jury found Google had infringed Oracle’s copyright by copying into Android the "structure, sequence and organization" of 37 Java application programming interfaces.
The trial judge, William Alsup, ruled later that APIs aren't eligible for protection under U.S. copyright law, dealing Oracle's case a seemingly fatal blow. An appeals court overturned that ruling, however. Google appealed to the Supreme Court, which declined to take the case. So it now heads back to Alsup's court to retry the issue of fair use.
As Oracle tells it, Google was in a mad rush to get its operating system to market before competing platforms could take hold. It chose to use Java because there were already millions of programmers familiar with the language.
Google has always insisted that its use of Java APIs fall under fair use, which allows for limited copying of copyrighted material. That will be once again its argument when the two tech giants head to court again in May. For now, however, Google will have to tackle the sky high damages that Oracle is demanding from Google.
That sum, computed by Oracle's own damages expert, is made up of $475 million of actual damages plus $8.83 billion from profits that Google made off Android, including from mobile advertising and apps. Google, however, criticized the computation, saying that damages can only be computed from profits where the actual infringing code was used. In this case, Google claims that the 37 APIs it was said to be infringing is only a small fraction of the total Android codebase. Google itself computes damages around $100 million only.
The estimate from Oracle's damages expert, James Malackowski, comprises two parts: $475 million for damages incurred by Oracle, and $8.8 billion for profit made by Google.
The first figure accounts for money Oracle might have made from licensing Java to handset makers itself, if Google hadn’t developed Android. The second is for profit Google made from Android, including from mobile advertising and apps and content sold through the Android Market and Google Play.
In a court filing last week, Google blasted Malackowski's report and asked Alsup to exclude parts of it from trial, saying it "ignores the statutory standard for copyright